My weeks have been increasingly devoted to the study and
treatment of MS, both in the clinic with Dr. Gauthier and in the lab. It’s been
a very educational and great experience learning about the details of a new
pathology for me. While I had a basic understanding of MS before, it takes a
very different approach to bring it in light of a clinical context. The
integration of understanding pathophysiological events and information
interpreted from diagnostic tools is only part of the picture. As with many
diseases, the precise triggers are unknown, and the precise course of events
for each patient is different. Yet, in most cases, the treatment options are
broadly applied to patients regardless of where they fall in the relative
spectrum of the disease. Importantly, the decision for treatment rests greatly
on patient compliance. If a patient is more likely to take their medication
regularly if its an oral dosing, the physician may be more inclined to pursue
this route though the medication itself is less effective than an i.v
injection-based treatment. Of course, all parties are informed of the relative
efficacy of the treatment options. However, it does make for a compelling
thought to have a better balance of more effective remedies to delay the onset
of progressive phase for each patient.
The clinical aspect of MS that I have observed over the last
few weeks has reinforced the meaning of the laboratory investigations being
conducted. In particular, Dr. Vartanian’s lab works to understand the precise
environmental or molecular triggers that may be involved in initiating MS. With
this idea in mind, understanding precisely what causes the disease may dictate
preventative measures and improve the quality of current therapies. Dr.
Vartanian’s lab is researching a particular strain of bacteria and its
insidious toxin that the majority of the public may be exposed to in the course
of their lifetime. If exposed to this toxin, and perhaps in conjunction with
some predisposition, a person may trigger the onset of MS. Therefore, the lab
aims to develop a vaccine against the toxin and also examine some possible
carriers of exposure. Though my project
focuses on the vaccine construct, I have been assisting one of the post-docs in
the lab who is looking at finding sources of the toxin. This week was
interesting because she was able to detect the toxin in fresh store-bought
tilapia fish. Upon heat shock (cooking), the toxin becomes inactivated.
However, it certainly is an interesting discovery. She plans to examine other
types of seafood, plants and meat to see where else the toxin can be detected.
All in all, the vaccine project is moving forward. I cannot
believe we only have one week left! I will probably continue to come back to
this lab in August and occasionally afterwards to help them finalize the
vaccine construct. Due to some delays in materials, processing, and the usual
trial and error period, I would like to finish what I began in its entirety.
This necessitates some time in the lab after the program ends and the lab is
more than happy to have the help. Next week I will be observing the
cardiothoracic surgery, so I look forward to that as well.
So much to do and so little time is how the saying goes. I
find it couldn’t be truer here. So far, this immersion term has really been a
terrific experience and meaningful in more ways than I know how to express.
Hope everyone else had a nice week too!
No comments:
Post a Comment